Three Ways to Earn, One Way to Join
Article 1-7
Three Ways to Earn, One Way to Join
There has never been a moment in history when every person on earth had equal access to all three fundamental ways of generating economic value — capital, labor, and ideas. Birth determined which door opened for you. The 99% of humanity fund opens all three.
Income stream 1: The dividend (your share of capital)
Every person who joins receives an equal share of the fund. When the fund earns profits from its companies, those profits distribute equally per share. One person in Jakarta earns the same dividend per share as one person in Zurich. Birth country, educational background, and existing wealth are irrelevant to this calculation. You are a human being. This is your share of the economy we all collectively sustain.
As the dividend grows and the fund expands across industries, work becomes a choice rather than a survival requirement for more people. This does not mean people stop working. It means they stop accepting exploitation simply because they have no alternative. The labor market, for the first time, would have to genuinely compete for human participation.
A calculation of the dividends appears in the next article. They might not represent a lot for many citizens in developed countries but it would mean a world for many people in underdeveloped nations. One of the advantages for undeveloped countries would be a solution for hunger and a slowdown in migration for people looking for better opportunities as they would have a passive income and more local job opportunities.
Income stream 2: Employment (your labor)
Fund-owned companies employ people. Those employees earn market wages, with the additional accountability that their employer’s profits return to the public rather than to distant shareholders. Employment in fund companies is not charity — it is competitive work in well-governed enterprises with transparent pay, no incentive to offshore labor purely for cost savings, and a mission aligned with the fund’s global employment equity goals.
The manufacturing redistribution model means jobs go where people need them, not where labor can be most cheaply extracted.
Income stream 3: Innovation royalties (your ideas)
Anyone, anywhere, can submit an idea — a product, a service, a process improvement. The AI layer presents viable ideas to billions of shareholders. Shareholders vote on what they would buy and want the fund to develop and manufacture. If your idea wins the vote, the fund produces it, distributes it globally through its supply chain, and you earn a royalty on every sale for a fixed term — after which the intellectual property becomes part of the commons and its profits distribute equally to all shareholders.
This is a democratic patent system. Your idea’s value is not determined by whether you can afford a patent attorney or happen to know the right investor. It is determined by whether 8 billion people want what you invented. A farmer in Senegal and an engineer in South Korea compete on equal terms — the merit of the idea, validated by the only jury that matters: everyone.
The Gini coefficient
Economists measure inequality with a metric called the Gini coefficient — 0 represents perfect equality, 1 represents total concentration in a single hand. The global figure currently sits around 0.62, and has been slowly declining, depending on methodology (source: Milanović, World Bank inequality data). Equal dividends paid to every person on earth, combined with distributed employment and democratized innovation, would compress this number more dramatically than any redistribution policy in history. We will explore this in a dedicated analysis, but the direction is unambiguous: three income streams available to everyone flattens the curve.
One way to join
$1 a month. No account minimums. No accredited investor requirements. No geography restrictions. The first payment makes you a shareholder. Every subsequent payment increases the fund’s capacity to build or acquire its next company and pay a larger dividend to every person who holds a share — including you.
You are not donating. You are investing. And what you are investing in has never been available to most of the people reading this sentence.
The world order has been rearranged before — by explorers, by revolutionaries, by technologies that changed what was possible. This time, the rearrangement is mathematical, voluntary, transparent, and available to anyone with a phone and a dollar.
The question is not whether this is possible. The question is whether enough of us decide it should happen before those who benefit from the current arrangement decide it shouldn’t.
The implementation takes decades. The decision to start takes a moment. And every year we wait, the architecture we’re trying to change grows harder to adjust.